Crystallography Reports is a journal that publishes original articles short communications, and reviews on various aspects of crystallography: diffraction and scattering of X-rays, electrons, and neutrons, determination of crystal structure of inorganic and organic substances, including proteins and other biological substances; UV-VIS and IR spectroscopy; growth, imperfect structure and physical properties of crystals; thin films, liquid crystals, nanomaterials, partially disordered systems, and the methods of studies.PEER REVIEWCrystallography Reports is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 20 reviewers, both internal and external (95%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 20 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 30 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 20%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (iii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.

《結晶學報告》是一本發表原創文章的期刊，內容包括：簡短的通訊，綜述結晶學的各個方面：X射線、電子和中子的衍射和散射，無機和有機物質（包括蛋白質和其他生物物質）的晶體結構測定，紫外-可見光譜和紅外光譜。光學顯微鏡；晶體的生長、不完全結構和物理性質；薄膜、液晶、納米材料、部分無序系統和研究方法。同行評議結晶學報告是同行評審的期刊。我們使用單盲同行評審格式。我們的評審團隊包括20多名評審員，包括內部和外部評審員（95%）。2017年從提交到第一次決定的平均期限為20天，從第一次決定到接受的平均期限為30天。2017年提交稿件不合格率為20%。接受發表文章的最后決定由編輯委員會作出。受邀審稿人因利益沖突，認為審稿不合格或者不能審稿的，應當及時通知編輯，拒絕邀請。審稿人應以合理、合理的方式清楚地陳述自己的觀點，以便作者可以利用審稿人的論點來改進手稿。必須避免對作者的個人批評。審稿人應在審稿中指出：（1）作者未引用的任何相關出版作品；（2）以前出版物中報道的任何內容，但未給出適當的參考或引用；（3）任何實質性相似或重疊與其他手稿(發表或未發表)的個人知識。